Back issues by year published
2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996
| |
Year 2003>>
| | |
Spring 2003
The Challenge
Going After the Best
Can We Afford Excellence?
The Price of Excellence
Strength in Numbers
First & Goal

University Communications

External Affairs
ucla home

Spring 2003
Can We Afford Excellence?
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9

CHU: As the budget chair for the Health and Human Services Committee, I see the vast range of needs in California. And I have to say that looking at the budget and trying to find solutions, I don’t know that it is in our best interest to have the number of different encumbrances on the budget that we now have. We have this trend with different ballot initiatives of minimum guarantees for particular programs, and it’s getting more and more difficult to balance the budget. I would want to make sure that education is our top priority, but I don’t know if we should be caught in this web.

KUEHL: It’s a difficulty. Set-asides come about through an initiative process and reflect the desire of the voters. I would somewhat sadly say that I’m not certain that the voters would want to guarantee a minimum amount of money to UC because of the way the system is structured so that only a certain percentage of high school graduates can qualify to attend. It still seems to many people like a place that not most people can go.

TORRES-GIL: As legislators, what are some of the competing demands and pressures that you feel when you’re making decisions about funding priorities?

RICHMAN: There are competing demands in every area of the state budget, whether that’s K-12 education, health and human services, public safety or the judiciary. Those are all issues that we need to be concerned about. Some of those issues, in fact, also impact the University of California. For example, if we reduce Medi-Cal funding and thereby reduce funding for UC hospitals, that’s going to place an additional strain on UC.

CORREA: We have to approach the budget with a view to equity. I have spoken with representatives from UC, Cal State and the community colleges, and one of the big issues is assurance that when they take those cuts, it’s shared pain. I’m talking about percentage cuts that should be equal in some way. After all, the missions of each entity are equally important. You can’t have one without the other. When it comes to the kind of budget cuts that we’re looking to propose for the state of California, the three entities have to work more in collaboration.

<previous>  <next>

2005 The Regents of the University of California